Working at Bell Canada - Page 2

Logos provided by

Ratings for Bell Canada

  • Appreciation
    3.0
  • Company Outlook
    3.0
  • Fair Pay
    2.5
  • Learning and Development
    2.0
  • Manager Communication
    3.0
  • Manager Relationship
    4.5
  • Pay Transparency
    3.5
Find out what you should be paid
Use our tool to get a personalized report on your market worth.What's this?
United States (change)
How it works:
1
Enter city & years of experience
2
Add pay factors like skills & education
3
Find your market worth with a report tailored to you

Bell Canada Reviews

What is it like working at Bell Canada?

Manager, Financial Planning & Analysis:
Base Pay is low compared to market and their excuse is that it is pay for performance so you have to consider the lump sum half taxable bonus also as part of your pay. Management needs to improve with understanding what employees are looking for - raise the base compensation to accommodate for higher standard of living. They don’t understand that and don’t want to hear it either so look for excuses to cover up the main issue at hand. It is evident they are cheap and it shows in employee morale.
Business Analyst, IT:
Pros: Pay is good- bonus and occasional telework allowed.
Cons: Highly disorganized. Working methods are not best practices- lots of business units work in silos and doesn't allow for much improvements. Lots of pressure- too much work for some while others seems to have not enough.
My Review.
Retail Store Manager:
Pros: Huge company with lots of opportunities for growth.
Cons: Company is so big, you often get overlooked for vacancies as they look outside to recruit.
Corporate Culture.
Senior Project Manager, IT:
Pros: Enough time to work and go to school to gain further knowledge in the industry I work in. The new model may change over the next few years and may actually become an unsatisfactory place to work as the company is stressing change in some of the wrong ways by reducing educational developments.
Cons: The educational benefits are always first to be cut. Bell has no way to ensure the people that would benefit the company in acquiring additional knowledge in their area of expertise are first to attain it. So many people abuse the funding and when others that need it require it the funding is unavailable. This is short sighted for the employees as well as the employer to not have better control on the way educational development is spent.