Ratings for Condé Nast Publications
Find out what you should be paid
Use our tool to get a personalized report on your market worth.What's this?
Condé Nast Publications Reviews
What is it like working at Condé Nast Publications?
Self directed.
Quality Assurance (QA) Director in Pasadena:
Pros: ability to suggest and help projects
Cons: lack of ability to increase compensation and lack of transparency in salary adjustment
Demanding.
Editor in Chief, Magazine in Johannesburg:
Pros: Variety of content and exposure to many different industries, tastemakers, etc. Inspiration from colleagues to be the best.
Cons: Low compensation. No feedback from management.
The opposite of creative prisonn.
Senior Video Editor in New York:
Pros: The freedom to create, and the trust given to me
Cons: The lack of relatable colleagues
Featured Content
‹
Remote Work
New research shows how to set pay for remote employees
Gender Pay Gap
New research shows that each woman experiences the disparity of gender pay gap in different ways, depending on her position, age, race and education.
Compensation Best Practices Report
From compensation planning to variable pay to pay equity analysis, we surveyed 4,900+ organizations on how they manage compensation.
Salary Budget Survey Report
See how organizations are shifting their salary budgets this year.
Retention Report
Get strategies you can use to retain top talent and learn how impactful employee retention really is.
Variable Pay Playbook
Before you decide whether variable pay is right for your org, get a deeper understanding of the variable pay options and the cultural impact of pay choices.
›